`g.V()` - You are likely well acquainted with this bit of Gremlin. It is in virtually every traversal you read in documentation, blog posts, or examples and is likely the start of most every traversal you will write in your own applications.

While it is well known that g.V() returns a list of all the vertices in the graph, the technical underpinnings of this ubiquitous statement may be less so well established. First of all, the g is a variable. It could have been x, y or anything else, but by convention, you will normally see g. This g is a GraphTraversalSource and it spawns GraphTraversal instances with start steps. V() is one such start step, but there are others like E for getting all the edges in the graph. The important part is that these start steps begin the traversal.

In addition to exposing the available start steps, the GraphTraversalSource also holds configuration options (perhaps think of them as pre-instructions for Gremlin) to be used for the traversal execution. The methods that allow you to set these configurations are prefixed by the word "with". Here are a few examples to consider:

As you now know, a GraphTraversal is spawned from the start steps of a GraphTraversalSource. The GraphTraversal contain the steps that make up the Gremlin language. Each step returns a GraphTraversal so that the steps can be chained together in a fluent fashion. Revisiting the example from above:

the GraphTraversal components are represented by the has(), outE() and groupCount()-steps. The key to reading this Gremlin is to realize that the output of one step becomes the input to the next. Therefore, if you consider the start step of V() and realize that it returns vertices in the graph, the input to has() is going to be a Vertex. The has()-step is a filtering step and will take the vertices that are passed into it and block any that do not meet the criteria it has specified. In this case, that means that the output of the has()-step is vertices that have the label of "person" and the "name" property value of "josh" or "marko".

Given that you know the output of has(), you then also know the input to outE(). Recall that outE() is a navigational step in that it enables movement about the graph. In this case, outE() tells Gremlin to take the incoming "marko" and "josh" vertices and traverse their outgoing edges as the output.

Now that it is clear that the output of outE() is an edge, you are aware of the input to groupCount() - edges. The groupCount()-step requires a bit more discussion of other Gremlin components and will thus be examined in the following sections. At this point, it is simply worth noting that the output of groupCount() is a Map and if a Gremlin step followed it, the input to that step would therefore be a Map.

The previous paragraph ended with an interesting point, in that it implied that there were no "steps" following groupCount(). Clearly, groupCount() is not the last function to be called in that Gremlin statement so you might wonder what the remaining bits are, specifically: by(label()).next(). The following sections will discuss those remaining pieces.

It’s been explained in several ways now that the output of one step becomes the input to the next, so surely the Map produced by groupCount() will feed the by()-step. As alluded to at the end of the previous section, that expectation is not correct. Technically, by() is not a step. It is a step modulator. A step modulator modifies the behavior of the previous step. In this case, it is telling Gremlin how the key for the groupCount() should be determined. Or said another way in the context of the example, it answers this question: What do you want the "marko" and "josh" edges to be grouped by?

In this case, the answer to that question is provided by the anonymous traversal label() as the argument to the step modulator by(). An anonymous traversal is a traversal that is not bound to a GraphTraversalSource. It is constructed from the double underscore class (i.e. ), which exposes static functions to spawn the anonymous traversals. Typically, the double underscore is not visible in examples and code as by convention, TinkerPop typically recommends that the functions of that class be exposed in a standalone fashion. In Java, that would mean statically importing the methods, thus allowing .label() to be referred to simply as label().

In the context of the example traversal, you can imagine Gremlin getting to the groupCount()-step with a "marko" or "josh" outgoing edge, checking the by() modulator to see "what to group by", and then putting edges into buckets by their label() and incrementing a counter on each bucket.

The output is thus an edge label distribution for the outgoing edges of the "marko" and "josh" vertices.

Terminal steps are different from the GraphTraversal steps in that terminal steps do not return a GraphTraversal instance, but instead return the result of the GraphTraversal. In the case of the example, next() is the terminal step and it returns the Map constructed in the groupCount()-step. Other examples of terminal steps include: hasNext(), toList(), and iterate(). Without terminal steps, you don’t have a result. You only have a GraphTraversal

It is worth backing up a moment to re-examine the has()-step. Now that you have come to understand anonymous traversals, it would be reasonable to make the assumption that the within() argument to has() falls into that category. It does not. The within() option is not a step either, but instead, something called an expression. An expression typically refers to anything not mentioned in the previously described Gremlin component categories that can make Gremlin easier to read, write and maintain. Common examples of expressions would be string tokens, enum values, and classes with static methods that might spawn certain required values.

A concrete example would be the class from which within() is called - P. The P class spawns Predicate values that can be used as arguments for certain traversals teps. Another example would be the T enum which provides a type safe way to reference id and label keys in a traversal. Like anonymous traversals, these classes are usually statically imported so that instead of having to write P.within(), you can simply write within(), as shown in the example.